Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB ($400) vs Crucial T710 2TB ($435). $/TB analysis, performance, and use-case recommendations.
Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB and Crucial T710 2TB are direct competitors — same generation, same capacity. Choose by controller behavior under sustained load, DRAM/HMB cache strategy, and $/TB economics.
Hardware-wise, the Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB runs on Samsung's in-house Presto controller, designed specifically for the 9100 PRO series. The Crucial T710 2TB pairs an SMI SM2508 controller that drew industry attention in 2024 for finally taming Gen 5 thermals.
The cheaper drive — Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB at $200.00/TB — saves you $17.50 per TB versus the Crucial T710 2TB. Worth it if you're capacity-constrained; either works if you just want one fast drive.
For PS5 expansion, both are PCIe Gen 4 M.2 2280 drives that meet Sony's minimum spec (14,500 MB/s read). The console can't take advantage of speeds beyond that, so save money by choosing the Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB. Heavy write workloads — video editing, RAW photo libraries, backup operations — favor the Crucial T710 2TB's 14,000 MB/s sustained write speed. Both drives use the 2280 form factor, which is too long for Steam Deck or ROG Ally — you'd need a 2230 variant if either manufacturer offers one, or a dedicated handheld-format drive instead.
How do these two fit the wider Gen 5 2 TB field? Out of 11 tracked drives, the Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB is #7 on $/TB and the Crucial T710 2TB is #10. Neither cracks the top of the value table, so it's worth glancing at the alternatives below before picking either.
As of July 27, 2026, these tracked drives undercut both the Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB and Crucial T710 2TB on $/TB:
The Samsung 9100 PRO 2TB is the right call if the lower retail price ($400 vs $435), and better $/TB economics ($200.00/TB) matter to you. Samsung's PRO line has the longest track record for firmware reliability — over a decade of consumer SSDs with global RMA support.
Crucial typically delivers the best $/TB among DRAM-equipped NVMes because Micron sells direct rather than going through brand licensing.