SSD comparison · Updated May 14, 2026

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB vs WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB ($769) vs WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB ($829). $/TB analysis, performance, and use-case recommendations.

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB Gen 5

Samsung · Samsung Presto
$769
$192.25/TB
View on Amazon →

WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB Gen 5

WD · SMI SM2508
$829
$207.25/TB
View on Amazon →
Generation
Gen 5
Gen 5
Price (USD)
$769
$829
Capacity
4 TB
4 TB
$/TB
$192.25
$207.25
Sequential read
14,800 MB/s
14,900 MB/s
Sequential write
13,400 MB/s
11,000 MB/s
Interface
PCIe 5.0 x4
PCIe 5.0 x4
Controller
Samsung Presto
SMI SM2508
DRAM cache
Yes
Yes
TBW endurance
2,400 TBW
2,400 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PS5 compatible
Yes
Yes

Verdict: Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB vs WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB and WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB are direct competitors — same generation, same capacity. Choose by controller behavior under sustained load, DRAM/HMB cache strategy, and $/TB economics.

Hardware-wise, the Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB runs on the proprietary Samsung Presto silicon found only in the 9100 PRO line. The WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB pairs SMI's SM2508 silicon, which became the default Gen 5 controller for power-conscious flagships.

Real-world use cases

Heading to a PlayStation 5? Both drives drop into the console's M.2 bay and report identical real-world benchmarks since the PS5 caps storage at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB wins this matchup on $/TB. For content creators routinely rendering 4K or 8K video, the Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB's 13,400 MB/s sustained write is the deciding factor — multi-GB project files land noticeably faster than on the alternative. Note for handheld gamers: M.2 2280 is the desktop/laptop standard. Steam Deck and the ROG Ally line need 2230 drives — neither Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB nor WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB fits without modification.

Pick the Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB if...

The Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB is the right call if the lower retail price ($769 vs $829), better $/TB economics ($192.25/TB), and higher sustained writes (13,400 MB/s) matter to you. Among consumer SSD makers, Samsung's PRO series consistently scores highest on long-term reliability surveys (Backblaze, Puget Systems Q1 2026 data).

Pick the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB if...

The WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB fits buyers who prefer its specific performance profile or have brand preference for WD.

Best value for money

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB
$192.25/TB beats the alternative by 7%

Best for gaming

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB
Strong $/MB-s ratio for game loads, and fits the PS5 expansion slot

Best for content creators

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB
Best write-heavy profile here: 13,400 MB/s sustained, 2,400 TBW

Best for PS5

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB
PS5-compatible Gen 4 at $192.25/TB

Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB vs WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB — common questions

What's the price difference between Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB and WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB?

The Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB costs $769 (192.25 per TB), while the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB runs $829 (207.25 per TB). The gap is $60, equivalent to about 7% per TB. Prices change weekly; check current Amazon listings before deciding.

Does the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB's read advantage matter in practice?

Specs say yes (14,900 MB/s versus 14,800 MB/s). Real-world testing says rarely. Game load times and OS boots saturate well below either drive's peak read speed. The advantage shows up in sustained sequential reads — large file copies, raw video reads, dataset loads.

Will the Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB or WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB work in my PlayStation 5?

Yes to both — both meet Sony's expansion specs (PCIe Gen 4 NVMe, M.2 2280, with a heatsink). The PS5 won't differentiate between them in benchmarks because its internal storage controller throttles to PCIe Gen 4 speeds. Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB wins this matchup if price is your tiebreaker.

Bottom line: Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB or WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB?

Default recommendation: Samsung 9100 PRO 4TB. It hits the right balance of price ($192.25/TB), Gen 5 performance, and brand support for the average buyer. The WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB has its place if you need faster sequential reads, but that's a narrower use case.