SSD comparison · Updated July 27, 2026 · Prices verified July 27, 2026

Samsung 990 PRO 1TB vs Crucial P310 2TB

Side-by-side: Samsung 990 PRO 1TB ($239) vs Crucial P310 2TB ($292). $/TB winner, specs, real-world picks for July 2026.

Samsung 990 PRO 1TB Gen 4

Samsung · Samsung Pascal
$239
↑ was $220 on July 6, 2026
$239.00/TB
View on Amazon →

Crucial P310 2TB Gen 4

Crucial · Phison E27T
$292
↑ was $247 on July 13, 2026
$146.00/TB
View on Amazon →
Generation
Gen 4
Gen 4
Price (USD)
$239
$292
Capacity
1 TB
2 TB
$/TB
$239.00
$146.00
Sequential read
7,450 MB/s
7,100 MB/s
Sequential write
6,900 MB/s
6,000 MB/s
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
PCIe 4.0 x4
Controller
Samsung Pascal
Phison E27T
DRAM cache
Yes
No (HMB)
TBW endurance
600 TBW
880 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PS5 compatible
Yes
Yes

Verdict: Samsung 990 PRO 1TB vs Crucial P310 2TB

Both run on Gen 4 hardware but at different capacities: 1 TB for the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB versus 2 TB for the Crucial P310 2TB. Whether the larger drive's $/TB advantage justifies the higher upfront cost depends on how much you actually need.

Hardware-wise, the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB runs on the in-house Samsung Pascal — engineered specifically for the 990 PRO at 8nm. The Crucial P310 2TB pairs an E27T controller built specifically for DRAM-less Gen 4 SSDs.

Money matters here — $146.00/TB on the Crucial P310 2TB versus $239.00/TB on the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB. That's enough of a spread that for budget-conscious builders, the Crucial P310 2TB becomes the default unless reviews of your specific workload prefer the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB.

The DRAM-vs-HMB question divides opinion: Samsung 990 PRO 1TB's on-board DRAM theoretically helps under sustained workloads, while Crucial P310 2TB's HMB approach has matured enough that most users won't see the difference. Pick on price if everything else is similar.

Crucial P310 2TB earns higher TBW ratings (880 vs 600 TBW) — relevant for sustained write workloads, irrelevant for everything else.

Real-world use cases

Heading to a PlayStation 5? Both drives drop into the console's M.2 bay and report identical real-world benchmarks since the PS5 caps storage at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The Crucial P310 2TB wins this matchup on $/TB. For content creators routinely rendering 4K or 8K video, the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB's 6,900 MB/s sustained write is the deciding factor — multi-GB project files land noticeably faster than on the alternative. Note for handheld gamers: M.2 2280 is the desktop/laptop standard. Steam Deck and the ROG Ally line need 2230 drives — neither Samsung 990 PRO 1TB nor Crucial P310 2TB fits without modification.

Market context: the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB ranks #3 of 4 Gen 4 1 TB drives we track by $/TB, while the Crucial P310 2TB ranks #4 of 11 Gen 4 2 TB drives. Neither cracks the top of the value table, so it's worth glancing at the alternatives below before picking either.

Pick the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB if...

Go with the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB for the lower retail price ($239 vs $292), and a dedicated DRAM cache chip. Among consumer SSD makers, Samsung's PRO series consistently scores highest on long-term reliability surveys (Backblaze, Puget Systems Q1 2026 data).

Pick the Crucial P310 2TB if...

Go with the Crucial P310 2TB for better $/TB economics ($146.00/TB), and a higher TBW endurance rating (880 TBW).

Best value for money

Crucial P310 2TB
$146.00/TB beats the alternative by 39%

Best for gaming

Crucial P310 2TB
Strong $/MB-s ratio for game loads, and fits the PS5 expansion slot

Best for content creators

Samsung 990 PRO 1TB
Best write-heavy profile here: 6,900 MB/s sustained, 600 TBW

Best for PS5

Crucial P310 2TB
PS5-compatible Gen 4 at $146.00/TB

Samsung 990 PRO 1TB vs Crucial P310 2TB — common questions

What's the price difference between Samsung 990 PRO 1TB and Crucial P310 2TB?

The Crucial P310 2TB costs $292 (146.00 per TB), while the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB runs $239 (239.00 per TB). The gap is $53, equivalent to about 39% per TB. Prices change weekly; check current Amazon listings before deciding.

Does the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB's read advantage matter in practice?

Specs say yes (7,450 MB/s versus 7,100 MB/s). Real-world testing says rarely. Game load times and OS boots saturate well below either drive's peak read speed. The advantage shows up in sustained sequential reads — large file copies, raw video reads, dataset loads.

Will the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB or Crucial P310 2TB work in my PlayStation 5?

Yes to both — both meet Sony's expansion specs (PCIe Gen 4 NVMe, M.2 2280, with a heatsink). The PS5 won't differentiate between them in benchmarks because its internal storage controller throttles to PCIe Gen 4 speeds. Crucial P310 2TB wins this matchup if price is your tiebreaker.

Does the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB's DRAM cache make a noticeable difference?

For OS, gaming, and general productivity: no. The Crucial P310 2TB's HMB (Host Memory Buffer) implementation matches DRAM performance within 5% on these workloads. DRAM matters for sustained random writes — databases, multi-GB file operations, video editing project saves. Heavy daily writers see the difference; casual users do not.

How much does the 280 TBW endurance gap actually matter?

For most buyers, it doesn't. The Crucial P310 2TB's 880 TBW versus the Samsung 990 PRO 1TB's 600 TBW translates to years of additional theoretical lifetime, but consumer drives almost always die from controller failure or firmware issues long before reaching TBW limits.

Bottom line: Samsung 990 PRO 1TB or Crucial P310 2TB?

Default recommendation: Crucial P310 2TB. It hits the right balance of price ($146.00/TB), Gen 4 performance, and brand support for the average buyer. The Samsung 990 PRO 1TB has its place if you need higher sustained write speeds, but that's a narrower use case.