SSD comparison · Updated July 27, 2026 · Prices verified July 27, 2026

Samsung 990 PRO 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB

Compare Samsung 990 PRO 2TB and Lexar NM790 2TB: prices, speeds, $/TB. Which to buy in July 2026? Full spec breakdown.

Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Gen 4

Samsung · Samsung Pascal
$388
↓ was $390 on July 13, 2026
$194.00/TB
View on Amazon →

Lexar NM790 2TB Gen 4

Lexar · MAP1602
$310
↓ was $380 on July 6, 2026
$155.00/TB
View on Amazon →
Generation
Gen 4
Gen 4
Price (USD)
$388
$310
Capacity
2 TB
2 TB
$/TB
$194.00
$155.00
Sequential read
7,450 MB/s
7,400 MB/s
Sequential write
6,900 MB/s
6,500 MB/s
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
PCIe 4.0 x4
Controller
Samsung Pascal
MAP1602
DRAM cache
Yes
No (HMB)
TBW endurance
1,200 TBW
1,500 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PS5 compatible
Yes
Yes

Verdict: Samsung 990 PRO 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB

Both the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB and Lexar NM790 2TB sit in the Gen 4 category at 2 TB, so the matchup turns on controller efficiency, cache topology, and current pricing rather than raw class differences.

Hardware-wise, the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB runs on the in-house Samsung Pascal — engineered specifically for the 990 PRO at 8nm. The Lexar NM790 2TB pairs a MAP1602 controller built specifically for DRAM-less HMB designs.

There's a modest pricing advantage for the Lexar NM790 2TB: $155.00/TB compared with $194.00/TB. For typical gaming and productivity, this becomes the deciding factor when specs are close.

The Samsung 990 PRO 2TB carries a dedicated DRAM chip for FTL (Flash Translation Layer) mapping; the Lexar NM790 2TB relies on HMB (Host Memory Buffer), borrowing 64 MB from system RAM. The practical gap shows up only under sustained random write loads.

Real-world use cases

PS5 owners get no measurable benefit from either drive's peak speed because Sony's internal NVMe controller throttles to ~5,500 MB/s; treat Samsung 990 PRO 2TB and Lexar NM790 2TB as interchangeable here and let price decide. Note for handheld gamers: M.2 2280 is the desktop/laptop standard. Steam Deck and the ROG Ally line need 2230 drives — neither Samsung 990 PRO 2TB nor Lexar NM790 2TB fits without modification.

Zoom out from this pair for a moment. Among the 11 Gen 4 2 TB drives we track, the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB ranks #10 by $/TB and the Lexar NM790 2TB ranks #7. Neither is a value leader right now — if $/TB is your priority, check the cheaper alternatives below before committing.

Cheaper 2 TB alternatives to both

As of July 27, 2026, these tracked drives undercut both the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB and Lexar NM790 2TB on $/TB:

$62.50/TB · $125

Silicon Power US75 2TB
7,000 MB/s read · 1,200 TBW · HMB

$67.50/TB · $135

Lexar EQ790 2TB
7,000 MB/s read · 1,200 TBW · HMB

$145.00/TB · $290

WD_BLACK SN7100 2TB
7,250 MB/s read · 1,200 TBW · HMB · Compare vs Lexar NM790 2TB →

Pick the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB if...

Pick the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB if you value a dedicated DRAM cache chip. Among consumer SSD makers, Samsung's PRO series consistently scores highest on long-term reliability surveys (Backblaze, Puget Systems Q1 2026 data).

Pick the Lexar NM790 2TB if...

Pick the Lexar NM790 2TB if you value the lower retail price ($310 vs $388), and better $/TB economics ($155.00/TB). The Lexar NM790 2TB captures the value tier well: same NAND class as flagships, paired with a DRAM-less controller that costs less and uses HMB for the address-mapping table.

Best value for money

Lexar NM790 2TB
$155.00/TB beats the alternative by 20%

Best for gaming

Lexar NM790 2TB
Strong $/MB-s ratio for game loads, and fits the PS5 expansion slot

Best for content creators

Samsung 990 PRO 2TB
Best write-heavy profile here: 6,900 MB/s sustained, 1,200 TBW

Best for PS5

Lexar NM790 2TB
PS5-compatible Gen 4 at $155.00/TB

Samsung 990 PRO 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB — common questions

What's the price difference between Samsung 990 PRO 2TB and Lexar NM790 2TB?

The Lexar NM790 2TB costs $310 (155.00 per TB), while the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB runs $388 (194.00 per TB). The gap is $78, equivalent to about 20% per TB. Prices change weekly; check current Amazon listings before deciding.

Does the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB's read advantage matter in practice?

Specs say yes (7,450 MB/s versus 7,400 MB/s). Real-world testing says rarely. Game load times and OS boots saturate well below either drive's peak read speed. The advantage shows up in sustained sequential reads — large file copies, raw video reads, dataset loads.

Is the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB or Lexar NM790 2TB better for PS5?

Both are PCIe Gen 4 NVMe M.2 2280 — both meet Sony's expansion requirements. The PS5's M.2 controller caps sustained speeds at ~5,500 MB/s, so both drives saturate it equally. Pick on price — the Lexar NM790 2TB at $155.00/TB is the better value. Add a heatsink (the PS5 cover provides minimal cooling) for thermal headroom.

Should I pay more for the DRAM in the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB?

Only if your workload includes sustained random writes — databases, source-code compilation against large repos, 4K-and-up video editing on long projects. For the majority of consumer use, the DRAM-less Lexar NM790 2TB performs identically while saving money.

Which has better endurance, the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB or Lexar NM790 2TB?

The Lexar NM790 2TB carries the higher rating: 1,500 TBW versus 1,200 TBW on the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB. For typical consumer use this rarely matters — even 600 TBW takes 10+ years of normal writes to consume. Content creators writing 50+ GB daily should weight TBW more heavily.

Bottom line: Samsung 990 PRO 2TB or Lexar NM790 2TB?

Default recommendation: Lexar NM790 2TB. It hits the right balance of price ($155.00/TB), Gen 4 performance, and brand support for the average buyer. The Samsung 990 PRO 2TB has its place if you need higher sustained write speeds, but that's a narrower use case.

Are there cheaper 2 TB SSDs than the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB and Lexar NM790 2TB?

Yes. As of July 27, 2026, the Silicon Power US75 2TB ($62.50/TB), Lexar EQ790 2TB ($67.50/TB), WD_BLACK SN7100 2TB ($145.00/TB) all undercut both drives on price per terabyte. Budget drives in this range are typically DRAM-less, which matters only for sustained random-write workloads — for gaming and general use they perform comparably.