SSD comparison · Updated May 14, 2026

TeamGroup Z540 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB

Compare TeamGroup Z540 2TB and Lexar NM790 2TB: prices, speeds, $/TB. Which to buy in May 2026? Full spec breakdown.

TeamGroup Z540 2TB Gen 5

TeamGroup · Phison E26
$329
$164.50/TB
View on Amazon →

Lexar NM790 2TB Gen 4

Lexar · MAP1602
$149
$74.50/TB
View on Amazon →
Generation
Gen 5
Gen 4
Price (USD)
$329
$149
Capacity
2 TB
2 TB
$/TB
$164.50
$74.50
Sequential read
12,400 MB/s
7,400 MB/s
Sequential write
11,800 MB/s
6,500 MB/s
Interface
PCIe 5.0 x4
PCIe 4.0 x4
Controller
Phison E26
MAP1602
DRAM cache
Yes
No (HMB)
TBW endurance
1,400 TBW
1,500 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PS5 compatible
Yes
Yes

Verdict: TeamGroup Z540 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB

TeamGroup Z540 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB pits two different generations against each other at 2 TB. The question isn't which is faster on paper — that's settled — it's whether the bandwidth gap shows up in your specific workload.

Hardware-wise, the TeamGroup Z540 2TB runs on the Phison E26 — the first widely-deployed Gen 5 controller, capable but thermally demanding. The Lexar NM790 2TB pairs MaxioTech's MAP1602 silicon, the default choice for budget Gen 4 drives in 2024-2026.

Price separates these two meaningfully. The Lexar NM790 2TB costs $74.50/TB versus $164.50/TB for the TeamGroup Z540 2TB — a 55% premium that needs justification in real benchmarks, not just spec-sheet bragging.

Read speeds favor the TeamGroup Z540 2TB: 12,400 MB/s versus 7,400 MB/s for the Lexar NM790 2TB, a 40% advantage. Sequential-heavy workloads notice; transactional workloads don't.

The TeamGroup Z540 2TB writes about 45% faster (11,800 MB/s vs 6,500 MB/s). Whether that matters depends entirely on what you write to the drive — gameplay capture and large project saves benefit, browsing and gaming do not.

The TeamGroup Z540 2TB carries a dedicated DRAM chip for FTL (Flash Translation Layer) mapping; the Lexar NM790 2TB relies on HMB (Host Memory Buffer), borrowing 64 MB from system RAM. The practical gap shows up only under sustained random write loads.

Real-world use cases

Heading to a PlayStation 5? Both drives drop into the console's M.2 bay and report identical real-world benchmarks since the PS5 caps storage at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The Lexar NM790 2TB wins this matchup on $/TB. The leap from Gen 4 to Gen 5 doubles peak throughput on paper but produces single-digit-percent improvements in game load times, OS boot, and most productivity benchmarks. The Lexar NM790 2TB is the better default unless you have a specific workload that needs the extra lanes. Heavy write workloads — video editing, RAW photo libraries, backup operations — favor the TeamGroup Z540 2TB's 11,800 MB/s sustained write speed. Both drives use the 2280 form factor, which is too long for Steam Deck or ROG Ally — you'd need a 2230 variant if either manufacturer offers one, or a dedicated handheld-format drive instead.

Pick the TeamGroup Z540 2TB if...

Pick the TeamGroup Z540 2TB if you value meaningfully faster reads (12,400 MB/s), higher sustained writes (11,800 MB/s), and a dedicated DRAM cache chip. The TeamGroup Z540 2TB wins on $/TB because it pairs DRAM-less MAP1602 silicon with low-margin distribution. Performance is fine for OS and gaming, weaker only on sustained random writes.

Pick the Lexar NM790 2TB if...

Pick the Lexar NM790 2TB if you value the lower retail price ($149 vs $329), and better $/TB economics ($74.50/TB). Budget-tier drives like the Lexar NM790 2TB have closed the gap with premium NVMes — the MAP1602 controller is genuinely competitive for everyday workloads at half the price.

Best value for money

Lexar NM790 2TB
Lowest $/TB in this matchup: $74.50/TB

Best for gaming

Lexar NM790 2TB
7,400 MB/s read at $74.50/TB, PS5-compatible

Best for content creators

TeamGroup Z540 2TB
Sustained 11,800 MB/s writes with dedicated DRAM, 1,400 TBW endurance

Best for PS5

Lexar NM790 2TB
PCIe Gen 4 NVMe at $74.50/TB — best PS5 expansion value here

TeamGroup Z540 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB — common questions

Which is cheaper, the TeamGroup Z540 2TB or Lexar NM790 2TB?

As of May 14, 2026, the Lexar NM790 2TB sits at $149 ($74.50/TB) on Amazon, versus $329 ($164.50/TB) for the TeamGroup Z540 2TB. SSD pricing has been volatile during the 2026 NAND shortage — verify current Amazon prices via the buy links above before purchasing.

What are the read and write speed differences?

Sequential read: TeamGroup Z540 2TB hits 12,400 MB/s, Lexar NM790 2TB hits 7,400 MB/s. Sequential write: TeamGroup Z540 2TB at 11,800 MB/s, Lexar NM790 2TB at 6,500 MB/s. Random performance is more relevant for daily use, and both drives perform similarly there for typical consumer workloads.

Is the TeamGroup Z540 2TB or Lexar NM790 2TB better for PS5?

Both are PCIe Gen 4 NVMe M.2 2280 — both meet Sony's expansion requirements. The PS5's M.2 controller caps sustained speeds at ~5,500 MB/s, so both drives saturate it equally. Pick on price — the Lexar NM790 2TB at $74.50/TB is the better value. Add a heatsink (the PS5 cover provides minimal cooling) for thermal headroom.

Should I pay more for the DRAM in the TeamGroup Z540 2TB?

Only if your workload includes sustained random writes — databases, source-code compilation against large repos, 4K-and-up video editing on long projects. For the majority of consumer use, the DRAM-less Lexar NM790 2TB performs identically while saving money.

Will I notice the difference between Gen 5 and Gen 4 in everyday use?

Realistically, no. Game load times, application launches, and OS boots complete before either drive maxes out its bandwidth. The TeamGroup Z540 2TB's spec advantage only manifests during sustained sequential operations — content creation pipelines, large dataset reads, scientific computing. For PC gaming and PS5 expansion, the Lexar NM790 2TB delivers identical perceived performance at lower cost.

Which should I buy in May 2026, TeamGroup Z540 2TB or Lexar NM790 2TB?

For most buyers, the Lexar NM790 2TB wins this matchup — it balances Gen 4 performance, $74.50/TB pricing, and proven reliability. Pick the TeamGroup Z540 2TB only if you specifically need its higher sustained write speeds.