SSD comparison · Updated July 27, 2026 · Prices verified July 27, 2026

WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB vs Crucial T500 2TB

WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB ($570) vs Crucial T500 2TB ($369). $/TB analysis, performance, and use-case recommendations.

WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB Gen 4

WD · SanDisk A101
$570
↑ was $558 on July 20, 2026
$142.50/TB
View on Amazon →

Crucial T500 2TB Gen 4

Crucial · Phison E25
$369
↓ was $370 on July 13, 2026
$184.50/TB
View on Amazon →
Generation
Gen 4
Gen 4
Price (USD)
$570
$369
Capacity
4 TB
2 TB
$/TB
$142.50
$184.50
Sequential read
7,000 MB/s
7,400 MB/s
Sequential write
6,700 MB/s
7,000 MB/s
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
PCIe 4.0 x4
Controller
SanDisk A101
Phison E25
DRAM cache
No (HMB)
Yes
TBW endurance
2,400 TBW
1,200 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PS5 compatible
Yes
Yes

Verdict: WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB vs Crucial T500 2TB

Both run on Gen 4 hardware but at different capacities: 4 TB for the WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB versus 2 TB for the Crucial T500 2TB. Whether the larger drive's $/TB advantage justifies the higher upfront cost depends on how much you actually need.

Hardware-wise, the WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB runs on the SanDisk A101 — a more recent design from the WD/SanDisk lineup. The Crucial T500 2TB pairs Phison's E25 silicon, found in many DRAM-equipped Gen 4 SSDs.

The cheaper drive — WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB at $142.50/TB — saves you $42.00 per TB versus the Crucial T500 2TB. Worth it if you're capacity-constrained; either works if you just want one fast drive.

Cache architecture differs: Crucial T500 2TB has DRAM hardware, WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB uses HMB. For OS, gaming, browsing — indistinguishable. For databases, large file ops, or 4K video editing — DRAM has a small but consistent edge.

On warranty endurance the WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB carries 2,400 TBW against Crucial T500 2TB's 1,200 TBW. Both will outlast typical use, but the gap matters if you're doing professional content work.

Real-world use cases

For PlayStation 5 builds, the console's internal M.2 slot tops out around 5,500 MB/s sustained, so both WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB and Crucial T500 2TB hit the same wall — pick whichever is cheaper at the moment you buy. Both drives use the 2280 form factor, which is too long for Steam Deck or ROG Ally — you'd need a 2230 variant if either manufacturer offers one, or a dedicated handheld-format drive instead.

Market context: the WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB ranks #5 of 6 Gen 4 4 TB drives we track by $/TB, while the Crucial T500 2TB ranks #9 of 11 Gen 4 2 TB drives. Neither cracks the top of the value table, so it's worth glancing at the alternatives below before picking either.

Pick the WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB if...

The WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB is the right call if better $/TB economics ($142.50/TB), and a higher TBW endurance rating (2,400 TBW) matter to you.

Pick the Crucial T500 2TB if...

The Crucial T500 2TB is the right call if the lower retail price ($369 vs $570), and a dedicated DRAM cache chip matter to you. Crucial typically delivers the best $/TB among DRAM-equipped NVMes because Micron sells direct rather than going through brand licensing.

Best value for money

WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB
Lowest $/TB in this matchup: $142.50/TB

Best for gaming

WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB
7,000 MB/s read at $142.50/TB, PS5-compatible

Best for content creators

Crucial T500 2TB
Sustained 7,000 MB/s writes with dedicated DRAM, 1,200 TBW endurance

Best for PS5

WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB
PCIe Gen 4 NVMe at $142.50/TB — best PS5 expansion value here

WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB vs Crucial T500 2TB — common questions

Which is cheaper, the WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB or Crucial T500 2TB?

As of July 27, 2026, the WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB sits at $570 ($142.50/TB) on Amazon, versus $369 ($184.50/TB) for the Crucial T500 2TB. SSD pricing has been volatile during the 2026 NAND shortage — verify current Amazon prices via the buy links above before purchasing.

What are the read and write speed differences?

Sequential read: WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB hits 7,000 MB/s, Crucial T500 2TB hits 7,400 MB/s. Sequential write: WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB at 6,700 MB/s, Crucial T500 2TB at 7,000 MB/s. Random performance is more relevant for daily use, and both drives perform similarly there for typical consumer workloads.

Will the WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB or Crucial T500 2TB work in my PlayStation 5?

Yes to both — both meet Sony's expansion specs (PCIe Gen 4 NVMe, M.2 2280, with a heatsink). The PS5 won't differentiate between them in benchmarks because its internal storage controller throttles to PCIe Gen 4 speeds. WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB wins this matchup if price is your tiebreaker.

Does the Crucial T500 2TB's DRAM cache make a noticeable difference?

For OS, gaming, and general productivity: no. The WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB's HMB (Host Memory Buffer) implementation matches DRAM performance within 5% on these workloads. DRAM matters for sustained random writes — databases, multi-GB file operations, video editing project saves. Heavy daily writers see the difference; casual users do not.

How much does the 1,200 TBW endurance gap actually matter?

For most buyers, it doesn't. The WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB's 2,400 TBW versus the Crucial T500 2TB's 1,200 TBW translates to years of additional theoretical lifetime, but consumer drives almost always die from controller failure or firmware issues long before reaching TBW limits.

Which should I buy in July 2026, WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB or Crucial T500 2TB?

For most buyers, the WD_BLACK SN7100 4TB wins this matchup — it balances Gen 4 performance, $142.50/TB pricing, and proven reliability. Pick the Crucial T500 2TB only if you specifically need its higher sustained write speeds.