SSD comparison · Updated July 27, 2026 · Prices verified July 27, 2026

WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB vs Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB

Which is better, WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB or Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB? July 2026 side-by-side with prices, specs, and verdict.

WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB Gen 5

WD · SMI SM2508
$380
↓ was $400 on July 20, 2026
$190.00/TB
View on Amazon →

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB Gen 5

Samsung · Samsung Piccolo
$369
↓ was $387 on July 13, 2026
$184.50/TB
View on Amazon →
Generation
Gen 5
Gen 5
Price (USD)
$380
$369
Capacity
2 TB
2 TB
$/TB
$190.00
$184.50
Sequential read
14,900 MB/s
7,250 MB/s
Sequential write
11,000 MB/s
6,300 MB/s
Interface
PCIe 5.0 x4
PCIe 4.0x4/5.0x2
Controller
SMI SM2508
Samsung Piccolo
DRAM cache
Yes
No (HMB)
TBW endurance
1,200 TBW
1,200 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PS5 compatible
Yes
Yes

Verdict: WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB vs Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB

A like-for-like comparison: both drives target the same buyer segment at the same Gen 5 2 TB class. The interesting question becomes which manufacturer's implementation aged better.

Hardware-wise, the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB runs on SMI's SM2508 silicon, which became the default Gen 5 controller for power-conscious flagships. The Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB pairs Samsung's Piccolo controller — DRAM-less with PCIe 4.0/5.0 dual-mode support.

On sequential reads the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB pulls ahead by 7,650 MB/s (14,900 MB/s versus 7,250 MB/s). That matters for moving large files but rarely shows up in game loads.

Write speeds skew toward the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB: 11,000 MB/s sustained against 6,300 MB/s. Content creators feel this; gamers do not.

WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB bundles a DRAM cache chip; Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB is DRAM-less. This sounds like a big deal but reviewers have been arguing for years about whether it actually matters in consumer use. For most workloads, no.

Real-world use cases

Heading to a PlayStation 5? Both drives drop into the console's M.2 bay and report identical real-world benchmarks since the PS5 caps storage at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB wins this matchup on $/TB. Video editors will gravitate toward the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB for its write headroom (11,000 MB/s sustained). Project saves and proxies move faster, which compounds across a workday. Heads-up — these are full-length 2280 drives. Steam Deck and most current handhelds require shorter 2230 modules, so check capacity-specific 2230 variants if that's your target platform.

Market context: we track 11 Gen 5 2 TB drives, and by price per terabyte the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB currently sits #5 while the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB sits #4. Neither is a value leader right now — if $/TB is your priority, check the cheaper alternatives below before committing.

Cheaper 2 TB alternatives to both

As of July 27, 2026, these tracked drives undercut both the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB and Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB on $/TB:

$62.50/TB · $125

Silicon Power US75 2TB
7,000 MB/s read · 1,200 TBW · HMB

$67.50/TB · $135

Lexar EQ790 2TB
7,000 MB/s read · 1,200 TBW · HMB

$145.00/TB · $290

WD_BLACK SN7100 2TB
7,250 MB/s read · 1,200 TBW · HMB · Compare vs Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB →

Pick the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB if...

Lean toward the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB when meaningfully faster reads (14,900 MB/s), higher sustained writes (11,000 MB/s), and a dedicated DRAM cache chip top your priority list.

Pick the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB if...

Lean toward the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB when the lower retail price ($369 vs $380), and better $/TB economics ($184.50/TB) top your priority list. The 990 EVO Plus uniquely supports both PCIe 4.0 x4 and PCIe 5.0 x2 modes — useful flexibility if you might upgrade motherboard generations.

Best value for money

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB
At $184.50 per TB, this is the cheaper option by $5.50/TB

Best for gaming

WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB
Hits the gaming sweet spot: 14,900 MB/s reads, reasonable price, PS5-ready

Best for content creators

WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB
11,000 MB/s sustained write, 1,200 TBW, DRAM

Best for PS5

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB
Both work in PS5; this one is cheaper at $184.50/TB

WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB vs Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB — common questions

How much does the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB cost compared to the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB?

Current Amazon pricing (verified July 27, 2026): WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB at $380 or $190.00/TB, Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB at $369 or $184.50/TB. The Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB is the cheaper of the two. Note: 2026 NAND shortage is causing weekly price changes.

Which is faster, WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB or Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB?

Reads: the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB leads at 14,900 MB/s versus 7,250 MB/s. Writes: the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB wins at 11,000 MB/s versus 6,300 MB/s. In real-world gaming and productivity the user-visible difference is typically under one second per operation.

Is the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB or Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB better for PS5?

Both are PCIe Gen 4 NVMe M.2 2280 — both meet Sony's expansion requirements. The PS5's M.2 controller caps sustained speeds at ~5,500 MB/s, so both drives saturate it equally. Pick on price — the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB at $184.50/TB is the better value. Add a heatsink (the PS5 cover provides minimal cooling) for thermal headroom.

Should I pay more for the DRAM in the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB?

Only if your workload includes sustained random writes — databases, source-code compilation against large repos, 4K-and-up video editing on long projects. For the majority of consumer use, the DRAM-less Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB performs identically while saving money.

If you could only buy one, which would it be?

The WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB. At $190.00/TB with 14,900 MB/s read and 4.7/5 reviews, it's the safer default unless your workload specifically benefits from the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB's specific brand preference.

Are there cheaper 2 TB SSDs than the WD_BLACK SN8100 2TB and Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB?

Yes. As of July 27, 2026, the Silicon Power US75 2TB ($62.50/TB), Lexar EQ790 2TB ($67.50/TB), WD_BLACK SN7100 2TB ($145.00/TB) all undercut both drives on price per terabyte. Budget drives in this range are typically DRAM-less, which matters only for sustained random-write workloads — for gaming and general use they perform comparably.