SSD comparison · Updated May 14, 2026

WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB vs Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB

Compare WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB and Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB: prices, speeds, $/TB. Which to buy in May 2026? Full spec breakdown.

WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB Gen 5

WD · SMI SM2508
$829
$207.25/TB
View on Amazon →

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB Gen 5

Samsung · Samsung Piccolo
$419
$104.75/TB
View on Amazon →
Generation
Gen 5
Gen 5
Price (USD)
$829
$419
Capacity
4 TB
4 TB
$/TB
$207.25
$104.75
Sequential read
14,900 MB/s
7,250 MB/s
Sequential write
11,000 MB/s
6,300 MB/s
Interface
PCIe 5.0 x4
PCIe 4.0x4/5.0x2
Controller
SMI SM2508
Samsung Piccolo
DRAM cache
Yes
No (HMB)
TBW endurance
2,400 TBW
2,400 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PS5 compatible
Yes
Yes

Verdict: WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB vs Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB

Both the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB and Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB sit in the Gen 5 category at 4 TB, so the matchup turns on controller efficiency, cache topology, and current pricing rather than raw class differences.

Hardware-wise, the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB runs on an SMI SM2508 controller that drew industry attention in 2024 for finally taming Gen 5 thermals. The Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB pairs Samsung's Piccolo — a DRAM-less controller with flexible PCIe generation support.

Price separates these two meaningfully. The Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB costs $104.75/TB versus $207.25/TB for the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB — a 49% premium that needs justification in real benchmarks, not just spec-sheet bragging.

In the read department, the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB leads by roughly 7 GB/s. The difference is more academic than practical for typical use, but it does matter for video editors moving multi-GB project files.

Write performance separates them too. The WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB sustains 11,000 MB/s writes versus 6,300 MB/s for the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB — a real advantage for video editors and anyone doing heavy file operations.

The WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB carries a dedicated DRAM chip for FTL (Flash Translation Layer) mapping; the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB relies on HMB (Host Memory Buffer), borrowing 64 MB from system RAM. The practical gap shows up only under sustained random write loads.

Real-world use cases

For PS5 expansion, both are PCIe Gen 4 M.2 2280 drives that meet Sony's minimum spec (7,250 MB/s read). The console can't take advantage of speeds beyond that, so save money by choosing the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB. For content creators routinely rendering 4K or 8K video, the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB's 11,000 MB/s sustained write is the deciding factor — multi-GB project files land noticeably faster than on the alternative. Note for handheld gamers: M.2 2280 is the desktop/laptop standard. Steam Deck and the ROG Ally line need 2230 drives — neither WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB nor Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB fits without modification.

Pick the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB if...

Pick the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB if you value meaningfully faster reads (14,900 MB/s), higher sustained writes (11,000 MB/s), and a dedicated DRAM cache chip.

Pick the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB if...

Pick the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB if you value the lower retail price ($419 vs $829), and better $/TB economics ($104.75/TB). Samsung designed the 990 EVO Plus around the Piccolo controller's dual-PCIe support — a hedge against both Gen 4 holdouts and Gen 5 early adopters.

Best value for money

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB
$104.75/TB beats the alternative by 49%

Best for gaming

WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB
Strong $/MB-s ratio for game loads, and fits the PS5 expansion slot

Best for content creators

WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB
Best write-heavy profile here: 11,000 MB/s sustained, 2,400 TBW

Best for PS5

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB
PS5-compatible Gen 4 at $104.75/TB

WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB vs Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB — common questions

What's the price difference between WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB and Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB?

The Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB costs $419 (104.75 per TB), while the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB runs $829 (207.25 per TB). The gap is $410, equivalent to about 49% per TB. Prices change weekly; check current Amazon listings before deciding.

Does the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB's read advantage matter in practice?

Specs say yes (14,900 MB/s versus 7,250 MB/s). Real-world testing says rarely. Game load times and OS boots saturate well below either drive's peak read speed. The advantage shows up in sustained sequential reads — large file copies, raw video reads, dataset loads.

Is the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB or Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB better for PS5?

Both are PCIe Gen 4 NVMe M.2 2280 — both meet Sony's expansion requirements. The PS5's M.2 controller caps sustained speeds at ~5,500 MB/s, so both drives saturate it equally. Pick on price — the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB at $104.75/TB is the better value. Add a heatsink (the PS5 cover provides minimal cooling) for thermal headroom.

Should I pay more for the DRAM in the WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB?

Only if your workload includes sustained random writes — databases, source-code compilation against large repos, 4K-and-up video editing on long projects. For the majority of consumer use, the DRAM-less Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB performs identically while saving money.

Bottom line: WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB or Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB?

Default recommendation: Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB. It hits the right balance of price ($104.75/TB), Gen 5 performance, and brand support for the average buyer. The WD_BLACK SN8100 4TB has its place if you need higher sustained write speeds, but that's a narrower use case.