SSD comparison · Updated July 27, 2026 · Prices verified July 27, 2026

WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB vs Crucial P310 4TB

Side-by-side: WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB ($535) vs Crucial P310 4TB ($519). $/TB winner, specs, real-world picks for July 2026.

WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB Gen 4

WD · WD G2
$535
↓ was $600 on July 20, 2026
$133.75/TB
View on Amazon →

Crucial P310 4TB Gen 4

Crucial · Phison E27T
$519
↓ was $520 on July 2, 2026
$129.75/TB
View on Amazon →
Generation
Gen 4
Gen 4
Price (USD)
$535
$519
Capacity
4 TB
4 TB
$/TB
$133.75
$129.75
Sequential read
7,300 MB/s
7,100 MB/s
Sequential write
6,600 MB/s
6,000 MB/s
Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
PCIe 4.0 x4
Controller
WD G2
Phison E27T
DRAM cache
Yes
No (HMB)
TBW endurance
2,400 TBW
1,760 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PS5 compatible
Yes
Yes

Verdict: WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB vs Crucial P310 4TB

Gen 4 at 4 TB is one of the most contested SSD segments in 2026, and WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB versus Crucial P310 4TB captures that competition well. The decision rarely comes down to peak speeds — both drives saturate typical workloads.

Hardware-wise, the WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB runs on the proprietary WD G2 silicon, optimized for the WD_BLACK line. The Crucial P310 4TB pairs an E27T controller built specifically for DRAM-less Gen 4 SSDs.

The DRAM-vs-HMB question divides opinion: WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB's on-board DRAM theoretically helps under sustained workloads, while Crucial P310 4TB's HMB approach has matured enough that most users won't see the difference. Pick on price if everything else is similar.

WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB earns higher TBW ratings (2,400 vs 1,760 TBW) — relevant for sustained write workloads, irrelevant for everything else.

Real-world use cases

If this purchase is for a PS5 storage expansion, the comparison flattens — Sony's PCIe Gen 4 controller normalizes both WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB and Crucial P310 4TB to roughly equal in-game load times. The cheaper drive is the smart pick. For content creators routinely rendering 4K or 8K video, the WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB's 6,600 MB/s sustained write is the deciding factor — multi-GB project files land noticeably faster than on the alternative. Note for handheld gamers: M.2 2280 is the desktop/laptop standard. Steam Deck and the ROG Ally line need 2230 drives — neither WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB nor Crucial P310 4TB fits without modification.

Zoom out from this pair for a moment. Among the 6 Gen 4 4 TB drives we track, the WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB ranks #4 by $/TB and the Crucial P310 4TB ranks #3. Neither cracks the top of the value table, so it's worth glancing at the alternatives below before picking either.

Cheaper 4 TB alternatives to both

As of July 27, 2026, these tracked drives undercut both the WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB and Crucial P310 4TB on $/TB:

$127.50/TB · $510

Lexar NM790 4TB
7,400 MB/s read · 3,000 TBW · HMB · Compare vs Crucial P310 4TB →

$128.25/TB · $513

TeamGroup MP44 4TB
7,400 MB/s read · 3,000 TBW · HMB · Compare vs Crucial P310 4TB →

Pick the WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB if...

Go with the WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB for a higher TBW endurance rating (2,400 TBW), and a dedicated DRAM cache chip. WD_BLACK's SN850X earned its reputation through consistent sustained performance under gaming workloads — fewer micro-stutters during open-world streaming than budget alternatives.

Pick the Crucial P310 4TB if...

Go with the Crucial P310 4TB for the lower retail price ($519 vs $535), and better $/TB economics ($129.75/TB).

Best value for money

Crucial P310 4TB
$129.75/TB beats the alternative by 3%

Best for gaming

Crucial P310 4TB
Strong $/MB-s ratio for game loads, and fits the PS5 expansion slot

Best for content creators

WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB
Best write-heavy profile here: 6,600 MB/s sustained, 2,400 TBW

Best for PS5

Crucial P310 4TB
PS5-compatible Gen 4 at $129.75/TB

WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB vs Crucial P310 4TB — common questions

What's the price difference between WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB and Crucial P310 4TB?

The Crucial P310 4TB costs $519 (129.75 per TB), while the WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB runs $535 (133.75 per TB). The gap is $16, equivalent to about 3% per TB. Prices change weekly; check current Amazon listings before deciding.

Does the WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB's read advantage matter in practice?

Specs say yes (7,300 MB/s versus 7,100 MB/s). Real-world testing says rarely. Game load times and OS boots saturate well below either drive's peak read speed. The advantage shows up in sustained sequential reads — large file copies, raw video reads, dataset loads.

Will the WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB or Crucial P310 4TB work in my PlayStation 5?

Yes to both — both meet Sony's expansion specs (PCIe Gen 4 NVMe, M.2 2280, with a heatsink). The PS5 won't differentiate between them in benchmarks because its internal storage controller throttles to PCIe Gen 4 speeds. Crucial P310 4TB wins this matchup if price is your tiebreaker.

Does the WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB's DRAM cache make a noticeable difference?

For OS, gaming, and general productivity: no. The Crucial P310 4TB's HMB (Host Memory Buffer) implementation matches DRAM performance within 5% on these workloads. DRAM matters for sustained random writes — databases, multi-GB file operations, video editing project saves. Heavy daily writers see the difference; casual users do not.

How much does the 640 TBW endurance gap actually matter?

For most buyers, it doesn't. The WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB's 2,400 TBW versus the Crucial P310 4TB's 1,760 TBW translates to years of additional theoretical lifetime, but consumer drives almost always die from controller failure or firmware issues long before reaching TBW limits.

Bottom line: WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB or Crucial P310 4TB?

Default recommendation: Crucial P310 4TB. It hits the right balance of price ($129.75/TB), Gen 4 performance, and brand support for the average buyer. The WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB has its place if you need higher sustained write speeds, but that's a narrower use case.

Are there cheaper 4 TB SSDs than the WD_BLACK SN850X 4TB and Crucial P310 4TB?

Yes. As of July 27, 2026, the Lexar NM790 4TB ($127.50/TB), TeamGroup MP44 4TB ($128.25/TB) all undercut both drives on price per terabyte. Budget drives in this range are typically DRAM-less, which matters only for sustained random-write workloads — for gaming and general use they perform comparably.