SSD comparison · Updated May 14, 2026

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB vs Crucial T500 2TB

Compare Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB and Crucial T500 2TB: prices, speeds, $/TB. Which to buy in May 2026? Full spec breakdown.

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB Gen 5

Samsung · Samsung Piccolo
$229
$114.50/TB
View on Amazon →

Crucial T500 2TB Gen 4

Crucial · Phison E25
$189
$94.50/TB
View on Amazon →
Generation
Gen 5
Gen 4
Price (USD)
$229
$189
Capacity
2 TB
2 TB
$/TB
$114.50
$94.50
Sequential read
7,250 MB/s
7,400 MB/s
Sequential write
6,300 MB/s
7,000 MB/s
Interface
PCIe 4.0x4/5.0x2
PCIe 4.0 x4
Controller
Samsung Piccolo
Phison E25
DRAM cache
No (HMB)
Yes
TBW endurance
1,200 TBW
1,200 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PS5 compatible
Yes
Yes

Verdict: Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB vs Crucial T500 2TB

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB vs Crucial T500 2TB pits two different generations against each other at 2 TB. The question isn't which is faster on paper — that's settled — it's whether the bandwidth gap shows up in your specific workload.

Hardware-wise, the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB runs on Samsung's Piccolo controller — DRAM-less with PCIe 4.0/5.0 dual-mode support. The Crucial T500 2TB pairs Phison's E25 silicon, found in many DRAM-equipped Gen 4 SSDs.

There's a modest pricing advantage for the Crucial T500 2TB: $94.50/TB compared with $114.50/TB. For typical gaming and productivity, this becomes the deciding factor when specs are close.

The Crucial T500 2TB carries a dedicated DRAM chip for FTL (Flash Translation Layer) mapping; the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB relies on HMB (Host Memory Buffer), borrowing 64 MB from system RAM. The practical gap shows up only under sustained random write loads.

Real-world use cases

Heading to a PlayStation 5? Both drives drop into the console's M.2 bay and report identical real-world benchmarks since the PS5 caps storage at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The Crucial T500 2TB wins this matchup on $/TB. The leap from Gen 4 to Gen 5 doubles peak throughput on paper but produces single-digit-percent improvements in game load times, OS boot, and most productivity benchmarks. The Crucial T500 2TB is the better default unless you have a specific workload that needs the extra lanes. Heavy write workloads — video editing, RAW photo libraries, backup operations — favor the Crucial T500 2TB's 7,000 MB/s sustained write speed. Both drives use the 2280 form factor, which is too long for Steam Deck or ROG Ally — you'd need a 2230 variant if either manufacturer offers one, or a dedicated handheld-format drive instead.

Pick the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB if...

The 990 EVO Plus uniquely supports both PCIe 4.0 x4 and PCIe 5.0 x2 modes — useful flexibility if you might upgrade motherboard generations.

Pick the Crucial T500 2TB if...

Pick the Crucial T500 2TB if you value the lower retail price ($189 vs $229), better $/TB economics ($94.50/TB), and a dedicated DRAM cache chip. Crucial typically delivers the best $/TB among DRAM-equipped NVMes because Micron sells direct rather than going through brand licensing.

Best value for money

Crucial T500 2TB
Lowest $/TB in this matchup: $94.50/TB

Best for gaming

Crucial T500 2TB
7,400 MB/s read at $94.50/TB, PS5-compatible

Best for content creators

Crucial T500 2TB
Sustained 7,000 MB/s writes with dedicated DRAM, 1,200 TBW endurance

Best for PS5

Crucial T500 2TB
PCIe Gen 4 NVMe at $94.50/TB — best PS5 expansion value here

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB vs Crucial T500 2TB — common questions

Which is cheaper, the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB or Crucial T500 2TB?

As of May 14, 2026, the Crucial T500 2TB sits at $189 ($94.50/TB) on Amazon, versus $229 ($114.50/TB) for the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB. SSD pricing has been volatile during the 2026 NAND shortage — verify current Amazon prices via the buy links above before purchasing.

What are the read and write speed differences?

Sequential read: Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB hits 7,250 MB/s, Crucial T500 2TB hits 7,400 MB/s. Sequential write: Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB at 6,300 MB/s, Crucial T500 2TB at 7,000 MB/s. Random performance is more relevant for daily use, and both drives perform similarly there for typical consumer workloads.

Is the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB or Crucial T500 2TB better for PS5?

Both are PCIe Gen 4 NVMe M.2 2280 — both meet Sony's expansion requirements. The PS5's M.2 controller caps sustained speeds at ~5,500 MB/s, so both drives saturate it equally. Pick on price — the Crucial T500 2TB at $94.50/TB is the better value. Add a heatsink (the PS5 cover provides minimal cooling) for thermal headroom.

Should I pay more for the DRAM in the Crucial T500 2TB?

Only if your workload includes sustained random writes — databases, source-code compilation against large repos, 4K-and-up video editing on long projects. For the majority of consumer use, the DRAM-less Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB performs identically while saving money.

Will I notice the difference between Gen 5 and Gen 4 in everyday use?

Realistically, no. Game load times, application launches, and OS boots complete before either drive maxes out its bandwidth. The Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB's spec advantage only manifests during sustained sequential operations — content creation pipelines, large dataset reads, scientific computing. For PC gaming and PS5 expansion, the Crucial T500 2TB delivers identical perceived performance at lower cost.

Which should I buy in May 2026, Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB or Crucial T500 2TB?

For most buyers, the Crucial T500 2TB wins this matchup — it balances Gen 4 performance, $94.50/TB pricing, and proven reliability. Pick the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB only if you specifically need its specific brand preference.