SSD comparison · Updated July 27, 2026 · Prices verified July 27, 2026

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB ($369) vs Lexar NM790 2TB ($310). $/TB analysis, performance, and use-case recommendations.

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB Gen 5

Samsung · Samsung Piccolo
$369
↓ was $387 on July 13, 2026
$184.50/TB
View on Amazon →

Lexar NM790 2TB Gen 4

Lexar · MAP1602
$310
↓ was $380 on July 6, 2026
$155.00/TB
View on Amazon →
Generation
Gen 5
Gen 4
Price (USD)
$369
$310
Capacity
2 TB
2 TB
$/TB
$184.50
$155.00
Sequential read
7,250 MB/s
7,400 MB/s
Sequential write
6,300 MB/s
6,500 MB/s
Interface
PCIe 4.0x4/5.0x2
PCIe 4.0 x4
Controller
Samsung Piccolo
MAP1602
DRAM cache
No (HMB)
No (HMB)
TBW endurance
1,200 TBW
1,500 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PS5 compatible
Yes
Yes

Verdict: Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB

When generations cross paths in a comparison like this one, the older-spec drive almost always wins on value while the newer one wins on benchmarks. Whether that benchmark advantage matters depends entirely on what you do with the drive.

Hardware-wise, the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB runs on the dual-mode Samsung Piccolo silicon that uniquely runs PCIe 5.0 x2 or PCIe 4.0 x4. The Lexar NM790 2TB pairs a MAP1602 controller built specifically for DRAM-less HMB designs.

The cheaper drive — Lexar NM790 2TB at $155.00/TB — saves you $29.50 per TB versus the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB. Worth it if you're capacity-constrained; either works if you just want one fast drive.

Real-world use cases

PS5 owners get no measurable benefit from either drive's peak speed because Sony's internal NVMe controller throttles to ~5,500 MB/s; treat Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB and Lexar NM790 2TB as interchangeable here and let price decide. The Gen 5 Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB pulls ahead on sequential bandwidth, but Gen 5 advantages rarely surface during everyday tasks — most software hasn't been rewritten to exploit 14,000+ MB/s pipelines. Note for handheld gamers: M.2 2280 is the desktop/laptop standard. Steam Deck and the ROG Ally line need 2230 drives — neither Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB nor Lexar NM790 2TB fits without modification.

Market context: the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB ranks #4 of 11 Gen 5 2 TB drives we track by $/TB, while the Lexar NM790 2TB ranks #7 of 11 Gen 4 2 TB drives. Neither cracks the top of the value table, so it's worth glancing at the alternatives below before picking either.

Cheaper 2 TB alternatives to both

As of July 27, 2026, these tracked drives undercut both the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB and Lexar NM790 2TB on $/TB:

$62.50/TB · $125

Silicon Power US75 2TB
7,000 MB/s read · 1,200 TBW · HMB

$67.50/TB · $135

Lexar EQ790 2TB
7,000 MB/s read · 1,200 TBW · HMB

$145.00/TB · $290

WD_BLACK SN7100 2TB
7,250 MB/s read · 1,200 TBW · HMB · Compare vs Lexar NM790 2TB →

Pick the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB if...

Among Samsung's lineup, the 990 EVO Plus is the only consumer drive that physically supports dual-generation PCIe — same hardware, different bus speed depending on platform.

Pick the Lexar NM790 2TB if...

The Lexar NM790 2TB is the right call if the lower retail price ($310 vs $369), and better $/TB economics ($155.00/TB) matter to you. The Lexar NM790 2TB captures the value tier well: same NAND class as flagships, paired with a DRAM-less controller that costs less and uses HMB for the address-mapping table.

Best value for money

Lexar NM790 2TB
$155.00/TB beats the alternative by 16%

Best for gaming

Lexar NM790 2TB
Strong $/MB-s ratio for game loads, and fits the PS5 expansion slot

Best for content creators

Lexar NM790 2TB
Best write-heavy profile here: 6,500 MB/s sustained, 1,500 TBW

Best for PS5

Lexar NM790 2TB
PS5-compatible Gen 4 at $155.00/TB

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB — common questions

What's the price difference between Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB and Lexar NM790 2TB?

The Lexar NM790 2TB costs $310 (155.00 per TB), while the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB runs $369 (184.50 per TB). The gap is $59, equivalent to about 16% per TB. Prices change weekly; check current Amazon listings before deciding.

Does the Lexar NM790 2TB's read advantage matter in practice?

Specs say yes (7,400 MB/s versus 7,250 MB/s). Real-world testing says rarely. Game load times and OS boots saturate well below either drive's peak read speed. The advantage shows up in sustained sequential reads — large file copies, raw video reads, dataset loads.

Will the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB or Lexar NM790 2TB work in my PlayStation 5?

Yes to both — both meet Sony's expansion specs (PCIe Gen 4 NVMe, M.2 2280, with a heatsink). The PS5 won't differentiate between them in benchmarks because its internal storage controller throttles to PCIe Gen 4 speeds. Lexar NM790 2TB wins this matchup if price is your tiebreaker.

How much does the 300 TBW endurance gap actually matter?

For most buyers, it doesn't. The Lexar NM790 2TB's 1,500 TBW versus the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB's 1,200 TBW translates to years of additional theoretical lifetime, but consumer drives almost always die from controller failure or firmware issues long before reaching TBW limits.

Is the Gen 5 Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB worth the price premium over the Gen 4 Lexar NM790 2TB?

For gaming, OS drive duty, and general productivity: no. Both drives saturate real-world workloads similarly despite Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB's 7,250 MB/s versus Lexar NM790 2TB's 7,400 MB/s on paper. Gen 5 makes sense for 8K video editing, large AI training datasets, and professional 3D rendering — workloads with sustained sequential reads.

Bottom line: Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB or Lexar NM790 2TB?

Default recommendation: Lexar NM790 2TB. It hits the right balance of price ($155.00/TB), Gen 4 performance, and brand support for the average buyer. The Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB has its place if you need specific brand preference, but that's a narrower use case.

Are there cheaper 2 TB SSDs than the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB and Lexar NM790 2TB?

Yes. As of July 27, 2026, the Silicon Power US75 2TB ($62.50/TB), Lexar EQ790 2TB ($67.50/TB), WD_BLACK SN7100 2TB ($145.00/TB) all undercut both drives on price per terabyte. Budget drives in this range are typically DRAM-less, which matters only for sustained random-write workloads — for gaming and general use they perform comparably.