SSD comparison · Updated May 14, 2026

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB

Compare Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB and Lexar NM790 2TB: prices, speeds, $/TB. Which to buy in May 2026? Full spec breakdown.

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB Gen 5

Samsung · Samsung Piccolo
$229
$114.50/TB
View on Amazon →

Lexar NM790 2TB Gen 4

Lexar · MAP1602
$149
$74.50/TB
View on Amazon →
Generation
Gen 5
Gen 4
Price (USD)
$229
$149
Capacity
2 TB
2 TB
$/TB
$114.50
$74.50
Sequential read
7,250 MB/s
7,400 MB/s
Sequential write
6,300 MB/s
6,500 MB/s
Interface
PCIe 4.0x4/5.0x2
PCIe 4.0 x4
Controller
Samsung Piccolo
MAP1602
DRAM cache
No (HMB)
No (HMB)
TBW endurance
1,200 TBW
1,500 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PS5 compatible
Yes
Yes

Verdict: Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB pits two different generations against each other at 2 TB. The question isn't which is faster on paper — that's settled — it's whether the bandwidth gap shows up in your specific workload.

Hardware-wise, the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB runs on Samsung's Piccolo controller — DRAM-less with PCIe 4.0/5.0 dual-mode support. The Lexar NM790 2TB pairs MaxioTech's MAP1602 silicon, the default choice for budget Gen 4 drives in 2024-2026.

Price separates these two meaningfully. The Lexar NM790 2TB costs $74.50/TB versus $114.50/TB for the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB — a 35% premium that needs justification in real benchmarks, not just spec-sheet bragging.

Real-world use cases

Heading to a PlayStation 5? Both drives drop into the console's M.2 bay and report identical real-world benchmarks since the PS5 caps storage at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The Lexar NM790 2TB wins this matchup on $/TB. The leap from Gen 4 to Gen 5 doubles peak throughput on paper but produces single-digit-percent improvements in game load times, OS boot, and most productivity benchmarks. The Lexar NM790 2TB is the better default unless you have a specific workload that needs the extra lanes. Both drives use the 2280 form factor, which is too long for Steam Deck or ROG Ally — you'd need a 2230 variant if either manufacturer offers one, or a dedicated handheld-format drive instead.

Pick the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB if...

The 990 EVO Plus uniquely supports both PCIe 4.0 x4 and PCIe 5.0 x2 modes — useful flexibility if you might upgrade motherboard generations.

Pick the Lexar NM790 2TB if...

Pick the Lexar NM790 2TB if you value the lower retail price ($149 vs $229), and better $/TB economics ($74.50/TB). Budget-tier drives like the Lexar NM790 2TB have closed the gap with premium NVMes — the MAP1602 controller is genuinely competitive for everyday workloads at half the price.

Best value for money

Lexar NM790 2TB
Lowest $/TB in this matchup: $74.50/TB

Best for gaming

Lexar NM790 2TB
7,400 MB/s read at $74.50/TB, PS5-compatible

Best for content creators

Lexar NM790 2TB
Sustained 6,500 MB/s writes via HMB, 1,500 TBW endurance

Best for PS5

Lexar NM790 2TB
PCIe Gen 4 NVMe at $74.50/TB — best PS5 expansion value here

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB vs Lexar NM790 2TB — common questions

Which is cheaper, the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB or Lexar NM790 2TB?

As of May 14, 2026, the Lexar NM790 2TB sits at $149 ($74.50/TB) on Amazon, versus $229 ($114.50/TB) for the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB. SSD pricing has been volatile during the 2026 NAND shortage — verify current Amazon prices via the buy links above before purchasing.

What are the read and write speed differences?

Sequential read: Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB hits 7,250 MB/s, Lexar NM790 2TB hits 7,400 MB/s. Sequential write: Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB at 6,300 MB/s, Lexar NM790 2TB at 6,500 MB/s. Random performance is more relevant for daily use, and both drives perform similarly there for typical consumer workloads.

Is the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB or Lexar NM790 2TB better for PS5?

Both are PCIe Gen 4 NVMe M.2 2280 — both meet Sony's expansion requirements. The PS5's M.2 controller caps sustained speeds at ~5,500 MB/s, so both drives saturate it equally. Pick on price — the Lexar NM790 2TB at $74.50/TB is the better value. Add a heatsink (the PS5 cover provides minimal cooling) for thermal headroom.

Which has better endurance, the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB or Lexar NM790 2TB?

The Lexar NM790 2TB carries the higher rating: 1,500 TBW versus 1,200 TBW on the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB. For typical consumer use this rarely matters — even 600 TBW takes 10+ years of normal writes to consume. Content creators writing 50+ GB daily should weight TBW more heavily.

Will I notice the difference between Gen 5 and Gen 4 in everyday use?

Realistically, no. Game load times, application launches, and OS boots complete before either drive maxes out its bandwidth. The Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB's spec advantage only manifests during sustained sequential operations — content creation pipelines, large dataset reads, scientific computing. For PC gaming and PS5 expansion, the Lexar NM790 2TB delivers identical perceived performance at lower cost.

Which should I buy in May 2026, Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB or Lexar NM790 2TB?

For most buyers, the Lexar NM790 2TB wins this matchup — it balances Gen 4 performance, $74.50/TB pricing, and proven reliability. Pick the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 2TB only if you specifically need its specific brand preference.