SSD comparison · Updated July 27, 2026 · Prices verified July 27, 2026

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB vs Lexar NM790 4TB

Which is better, Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB or Lexar NM790 4TB? July 2026 side-by-side with prices, specs, and verdict.

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB Gen 5

Samsung · Samsung Piccolo
$585
↓ was $600 on July 20, 2026
$146.25/TB
View on Amazon →

Lexar NM790 4TB Gen 4

Lexar · MAP1602
$510
↓ was $580 on July 6, 2026
$127.50/TB
View on Amazon →
Generation
Gen 5
Gen 4
Price (USD)
$585
$510
Capacity
4 TB
4 TB
$/TB
$146.25
$127.50
Sequential read
7,250 MB/s
7,400 MB/s
Sequential write
6,300 MB/s
6,500 MB/s
Interface
PCIe 4.0x4/5.0x2
PCIe 4.0 x4
Controller
Samsung Piccolo
MAP1602
DRAM cache
No (HMB)
No (HMB)
TBW endurance
2,400 TBW
3,000 TBW
Warranty
5 years
5 years
PS5 compatible
Yes
Yes

Verdict: Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB vs Lexar NM790 4TB

Cross-generation comparisons reveal whether you're paying for peak speed or sustained value. Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB vs Lexar NM790 4TB at 4 TB is a perfect lens for that question.

Hardware-wise, the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB runs on the dual-mode Samsung Piccolo silicon that uniquely runs PCIe 5.0 x2 or PCIe 4.0 x4. The Lexar NM790 4TB pairs a MAP1602 controller built specifically for DRAM-less HMB designs.

Lexar NM790 4TB's $127.50/TB pricing edges out Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB's $146.25/TB by about 13%. Not transformative, but a real difference at 2-4 TB capacities where it adds up.

Real-world use cases

PS5 owners get no measurable benefit from either drive's peak speed because Sony's internal NVMe controller throttles to ~5,500 MB/s; treat Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB and Lexar NM790 4TB as interchangeable here and let price decide. Generational difference matters mainly for sequential-heavy workloads. The Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB's 7,250 MB/s read beats Lexar NM790 4TB's 7,400 on paper, though in practice both feel identical loading games. Note for handheld gamers: M.2 2280 is the desktop/laptop standard. Steam Deck and the ROG Ally line need 2230 drives — neither Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB nor Lexar NM790 4TB fits without modification.

Market context: the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB ranks #1 of 6 Gen 5 4 TB drives we track by $/TB, while the Lexar NM790 4TB ranks #1 of 6 Gen 4 4 TB drives. That puts at least one of them near the top of the value table — a reasonable head-to-head to be choosing from.

At $127.50/TB, the Lexar NM790 4TB is already among the cheapest 4 TB drives we track — nothing in this class undercuts it. See the full $/TB ranking.

Pick the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB if...

Among Samsung's lineup, the 990 EVO Plus is the only consumer drive that physically supports dual-generation PCIe — same hardware, different bus speed depending on platform.

Pick the Lexar NM790 4TB if...

Lean toward the Lexar NM790 4TB when the lower retail price ($510 vs $585), and better $/TB economics ($127.50/TB) top your priority list. The Lexar NM790 4TB captures the value tier well: same NAND class as flagships, paired with a DRAM-less controller that costs less and uses HMB for the address-mapping table.

Best value for money

Lexar NM790 4TB
$127.50/TB beats the alternative by 13%

Best for gaming

Lexar NM790 4TB
Strong $/MB-s ratio for game loads, and fits the PS5 expansion slot

Best for content creators

Lexar NM790 4TB
Best write-heavy profile here: 6,500 MB/s sustained, 3,000 TBW

Best for PS5

Lexar NM790 4TB
PS5-compatible Gen 4 at $127.50/TB

Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB vs Lexar NM790 4TB — common questions

What's the price difference between Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB and Lexar NM790 4TB?

The Lexar NM790 4TB costs $510 (127.50 per TB), while the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB runs $585 (146.25 per TB). The gap is $75, equivalent to about 13% per TB. Prices change weekly; check current Amazon listings before deciding.

Does the Lexar NM790 4TB's read advantage matter in practice?

Specs say yes (7,400 MB/s versus 7,250 MB/s). Real-world testing says rarely. Game load times and OS boots saturate well below either drive's peak read speed. The advantage shows up in sustained sequential reads — large file copies, raw video reads, dataset loads.

Is the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB or Lexar NM790 4TB better for PS5?

Both are PCIe Gen 4 NVMe M.2 2280 — both meet Sony's expansion requirements. The PS5's M.2 controller caps sustained speeds at ~5,500 MB/s, so both drives saturate it equally. Pick on price — the Lexar NM790 4TB at $127.50/TB is the better value. Add a heatsink (the PS5 cover provides minimal cooling) for thermal headroom.

Which has better endurance, the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB or Lexar NM790 4TB?

The Lexar NM790 4TB carries the higher rating: 3,000 TBW versus 2,400 TBW on the Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB. For typical consumer use this rarely matters — even 600 TBW takes 10+ years of normal writes to consume. Content creators writing 50+ GB daily should weight TBW more heavily.

Will I notice the difference between Gen 5 and Gen 4 in everyday use?

Realistically, no. Game load times, application launches, and OS boots complete before either drive maxes out its bandwidth. The Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB's spec advantage only manifests during sustained sequential operations — content creation pipelines, large dataset reads, scientific computing. For PC gaming and PS5 expansion, the Lexar NM790 4TB delivers identical perceived performance at lower cost.

Bottom line: Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB or Lexar NM790 4TB?

Default recommendation: Lexar NM790 4TB. It hits the right balance of price ($127.50/TB), Gen 4 performance, and brand support for the average buyer. The Samsung 990 EVO Plus 4TB has its place if you need specific brand preference, but that's a narrower use case.